OML and the Sentient Protocol

Platforms
22

researche Looking good ty

23

This article is very useful and I am looking forward to the project

24

I’m looking forward to it.

25

This is a great article

26

Happy to see such information :fire: lfg!!

27

very well written. thanks for explanation!

28

This explain it clearly, am able to get what this project is all about which I believe is very interesting and needed.

29

is agi will be booming

30

An interesting piece. We are gearing towards the future.

31

Well detailed,Thanks for this

32

I asked a clear roadmap from Sentient AI in the chat from the perspective of a close beta tester.

Screenshot_2025-09-27-20-47-18-519_site.mises.browser
Screenshot_2025-09-27-20-47-18-519_site.mises.browser1080×2280 233 KB

And this sentient reply is one of the clearest and most comprehensive answers so far the structure phases, timelines, “what it means for beta users,” and a FAQ made the roadmap easy to digest. It shows strong awareness of what testers want: visibility, opportunities, and timing.

Sentient Strengths:

  • Direct relevance: The answer mapped directly to my request for the roadmap and beta involvement.

  • Clarity: The use of tables, phases, and FAQs improved readability and gave both macro and micro perspectives.

  • Actionable: Clear steps for how a beta user can contribute (staking, bug reports, PRs, forum participation).

  • Transparency: Explicit timelines (Q1, Q2, Q3 2025) created a sense of accountability.

I think the points to try and refine:

  1. Prioritization clarity – The roadmap lists many big items (GRID expansion, OML 1.0, Protocol v1, ROMA, Dobby models). It would help if the reply ranked which ones beta testers will feel first-hand impact from vs. those still in deep research.

  2. Feedback loop visibility – While testers are told to use GitHub/Discourse, the reply didn’t explain how feedback will be triaged or weighted (e.g., do bug reports directly affect roadmap? does beta reputation feed into feature priority?).

  3. Community governance link – The roadmap mentions $SENT voting “beyond Q3 2025,” but it could briefly explain how beta testers transition from feedback-only to actual voting influence.

Why this matters:
The roadmap already reassures testers they’re not neglected, but showing prioritization and feedback influence would tighten the trust loop and make community members feel their time investment has measurable impact.

33

Excellent Sentient explained. Appreciate for this